Paul M Furley Paul M Furley - 1 year ago 119
HTTP Question

Which HTTP status code should I use for a health-check failure?

I'm implementing a

endpoint which does some sanity checks on data in our database.

For example, we are collecting measurements and the status should go "bad" if the latest measurement is over an hour old.

I would like to point Pingdom at this URL to leverage their alerting infrastructure and tell us when something's wrong.

On a "good" status I will serve an HTML page with an HTTP 200 OK status. But what would an appropriate HTTP status code be for "bad"? Or would it be more correct not to convey this information via status code, but via HTML content instead?


Ken Ken
Answer Source

If your data is 'bad' because there is a service failure (even if that is a backend job failing) then a HTTP 500 seems like a valid response. It indicates that something, somewhere is broken.

It isn't very specific, you're shrugging your shoulders and saying:

The 500 (Internal Server Error) status code indicates that the server encountered an unexpected condition that prevented it from fulfilling the request.

ietf rfc7231

Recommended from our users: Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch. Free Download