GreenScape GreenScape - 1 year ago 257
C++ Question

No implicit conversion from std::string to std::string_view in C++17 (was in std::experimental::basic_string_view)

My question is regarding C++17:

What's the caveat of implicit conversion from std::basic_string to std::basic_string_view that it wasn't included in the interface of the latter?

I believe it would greatly improve this class. Especially the family of comparison operators that, also do not accept std::string as neither lhs nor rhs.

There is such conversion in library fundamentals TS specification:

This question is about why it was removed. Or rather not adopted.

Answer Source

basic_string_view is considered the lower level class. It's the providers of string containers who have the responsibility of providing implicit conversions to string_view. If you have your own string type, then you would give it a possibly explicit operator string_view() overload to perform implicit conversion.

As such, it was decided (PDF) that basic_string would provide the conversion to basic_string_view. The original Library Fundamentals version put the implicit conversion on basic_string_view, because a TS is usually an extension. It can't affect an existing type without effectively forking that type.

Recommended from our users: Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch. Free Download