I am using an open Source project (Open Scene Graph). I found that all the header file are in "File" format extension, which i found it to be "File With No Extension" as mentioned in some website.
I would like to know why those developer used this extension , rather than the traditional "h" file extension.
Any help is appreciated.
It seems you are talking about this repository of C++ code.
It looks like the authors of that code decided to follow the patterns of the C++ standard library. In standard C++, library headers are not supposed to have the
.h extension. So the following is correct:
With most implementations writing
<iostream.h> would also work, but the version without an extension is actually correct. The C++ standard library was able to drop extensions in C++98 due to the introduction of namespaces, and introduction of the
std namespace for the standard library.
The C++ standard neither requires nor forbids an extension for other headers, so it's entirely up to the authors of some software what file extension to use, if any. The most common choices are to use
.hpp, the latter being intended to distinguish C++ headers from C headers.
A quick look at the OpenSceneGraph code shows that they've followed the C++ standard library pattern in their includes. There are no extensions, and everything is in the
osg namespace, analogous to the
std namespace of the standard library. So using the OpenSceneGraph libraries is very similar to using the C++ standard library.
#include <osg/Camera> // Provides osg::Camera
It's the same pattern as:
#include <string> //Provides std::string
So I think it's safe to say that authors of the OSG wanted to follow the same pattern as in the C++ Standard Library. My personal opinion is that it's better to have a file extension, even if only to be able to search for header files.