C++ Question
Clang fails to compile template function in a template class specialization, which has *distinct return type* from the template declaration
The following function
derefItemX()//! Accessory Operations - template argument depended wrappers
template<bool SIMPLE> // For Nodes / non-scoped storage
struct Operations {
//! \brief Defererence wrapped or direct iterator
//!
//! \param iel IItemXT& - iterator to be dereferenced
//! \return ItemT& - resulting reference
template<typename IItemXT>
constexpr static auto& derefItemX(IItemXT& iel)
{
static_assert(is_base_of<std::forward_iterator_tag, typename IItemXT::iterator_category>::value
, "derefItemX(), IItemXT must be a forward iterator type");
return **iel; // Dereference an iterator of pointer to the value
}
};
//! Specialization for non-scoped storage (direct pointers)
template<>
template<typename IItemXT>
constexpr auto& Operations<true>::derefItemX(IItemXT& iel)
{
static_assert(is_base_of<std::forward_iterator_tag, typename IItemXT::iterator_category>::value
, "derefItemX(), IItemXT must be a forward iterator type");
return *iel; // Dereference an iterator of value to the value
}
...
// Usage:
auto& el = Operations<!is_pointer<typename IItemXT::value_type>
::value>::derefItemX(ic);
derefItemX()that says not much:
include/hierarchy.hpp:168:35: error: out-of-line definition of 'derefItemX' does not match any declaration in 'XXX::Operations<true>'
constexpr auto& Operations<true>::derefItemX(IItemXT& iel)
^~~~~~~~~~
Can anybody please explain:
- Why does CLang fail to compile ?
derefItemX() - How to parameterize an iterator dereferencing to either *x or **x using another approach that would work on different compilers?
Thanks a lot!
Note:
The same problem exists for C++11 when the return type is specified, but differs in the template declaration and specialization.
Looks like CLang requires to match the return types (of template functions in the template class declaration and specialization), which are not part of the function signature according to the standard. The "cross-compiler" solution as specified by @max66 is to have an empty declaration of the template class and required specializations.
Answer Source
I don't how to solve the problem in a general way; but this problem (if I'm not wrong) could be solved specializing the entire class; something like
#include <iterator>
#include <type_traits>
using namespace std;
template <bool>
struct Operations;
template<>
struct Operations<false> {
template<typename IItemXT>
constexpr static auto& derefItemX(IItemXT& iel)
{
static_assert(is_base_of<std::forward_iterator_tag, typename IItemXT::iterator_category>::value
, "derefItemX(), IItemXT must be a forward iterator type");
return **iel; // Dereference an iterator of pointer to the value
}
};
template<>
struct Operations<true> {
template<typename IItemXT>
constexpr auto& derefItemX(IItemXT& iel)
{
static_assert(is_base_of<std::forward_iterator_tag, typename IItemXT::iterator_category>::value
, "derefItemX(), IItemXT must be a forward iterator type");
return *iel; // Dereference an iterator of value to the value
}
};
Regarding the problem "why the clang fail to compile"... i'm confused and I don't know whos right between g++ and clang++
p.s.: sorry for my bad English