Alireza Fattahi Alireza Fattahi - 1 year ago 163
Java Question

Quartz 2.2 multi scehduler and @DisallowConcurrentExecution

Please consider this example.

A sample web application calls

on its start up. The scheduler configured to store its jobs in DB.

The application is copied on six web-servers.

So if we start six web-servers we will have six scheduler with same name on a single DB. As mentioned in

Never start (scheduler.start()) a non-clustered instance against the same set of database tables that any other instance with the same scheduler name is running (start()ed) against. You may get serious data corruption, and will definitely experience erratic behavior.

So this will fail.

My question is that if I am sure that all of my jobs have
will above work or it will still fail ?!

does not help, I should do it manually configure one server as some how Master

public class StartUp implements ServletContextListener {

public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent event) {

Are there better ways?!

Answer Source

Basically Rene M. is correct. Here are the docs in question vis-a-vis Quartz:

Now some background and a conceptual example from our own use at my company. We use quartz clustering mode within a Wildfly Cluster. That is each wildfly cluster node runs quartz. Since quartz is running in cluster mode itself and is pointed at the same database schema we are guaranteed to run one job per cluster. Again, see the documentation. The key issues are this:

  1. A single quartz cluster must run against a single quartz database
    schema. You obviously must create the relational database tables per the documentation. No biggie.
  2. You must set the files properly and a copy of which must exist for each node in the cluster. The same exact file
  3. Lastly you must use a NonJTA datasource otherwise the quartz cluster will fail. That often means in Wildfly world quartz will require its own datasource. example:

# Configure Main Scheduler Properties 

org.quartz.scheduler.instanceName = BjondScheduler
org.quartz.scheduler.instanceId = AUTO

# Configure ThreadPool 

org.quartz.threadPool.class = org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool
org.quartz.threadPool.threadCount = 5

# Configure JobStore 

org.quartz.jobStore.class = org.quartz.impl.jdbcjobstore.JobStoreCMT
org.quartz.jobStore.useProperties = false
org.quartz.jobStore.isClustered = true
org.quartz.jobStore.clusterCheckinInterval = 5000

org.quartz.scheduler.wrapJobExecutionInUserTransaction = true
org.quartz.scheduler.userTransactionURL = java:jboss/UserTransaction

org.quartz.jobStore.dataSource = PostgreSQLDS
org.quartz.jobStore.nonManagedTXDataSource = PostgreSQLDSNoJTA


# Configure Logging
#org.quartz.plugin.jobHistory.jobToBeFiredMessage=Bjond Job [{1}.{0}] to be fired by trigger [{4}.{3}] at: {2, date, HH:mm:ss MM/dd/yyyy} re-fire count: {7}
#org.quartz.plugin.jobHistory.jobSuccessMessage=Bjond Job [{1}.{0}] execution complete and reports: {8}
#org.quartz.plugin.jobHistory.jobFailedMessage=Bjond Job [{1}.{0}] execution failed with exception: {8}
#org.quartz.plugin.jobHistory.jobWasVetoedMessage=Bjond Job [{1}.{0}] was vetoed. It was to be fired by trigger [{4}.{3}] at: {2, date, dd-MM-yyyy HH:mm:ss.SSS}

Now our datasource snippet within standalone.xml:

            <datasource jta="false" jndi-name="java:jboss/datasources/PostgreSQLDSNoJTA" pool-name="PostgreSQLDSNoJTA" enabled="true" use-java-context="true" use-ccm="true">

You fill in the rest of this datasource element per your requirements. The @DisallowConcurrentExecution is a good idea to prevent multiple jobs on a single node form executing a particular method but it is the quartz clustering that prevents the same job running on multiple VM's; not this annotation.