FasEtNefas - 1 month ago 5x

Python Question

I am trying to implement heapsort but I am getting unexpected results. I think this is due to something I don't understand about how Python handles variables (I am talking about side effects). Here's the code:

`from math import *`

def parent(i):

return floor((i+1)/2)-1

def left(i):

return 2*i+1

def right(i):

return 2*i+2

def maxheapify(A, i):

l = left(i)

r = right(i)

if l < len(A) and A[i] < A[l]:

largest = l

else:

largest = i

if r < len(A) and A[largest] < A[r]:

largest = r

if largest != i:

temp = A[i]

A[i] = A[largest]

A[largest] = temp

maxheapify(A, largest)

def buildmaxheap(A):

for i in range(int(floor(len(A)/2)), -1, -1):

maxheapify(A, i)

def heapsort(A):

n = len(A)

buildmaxheap(A)

for k in range(len(A), 0, -1):

temp = A[0]

A[0] = A[k-1]

A[k-1] = temp

C = A[0:k-1]

maxheapify(C, 0)

A = C + A[k-1:n]

print(A)

Now when I run

`A = [2, 4, 1, 3, 7, 5, 9]`

heapsort(A)

print(A)

I obtain two printed lines (one from inside the heapsort showing that the sorting worked and one from the last print):

`[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9]`

[1, 7, 5, 3, 4, 2, 9]

Obviously, I'd like them both to be the same (which would mean that the sorting actually worked and A is sorted after calling heapsort(A))

So what I don't get is:

- If A is correctly sorted (at the point of the last line in heapsort(A)), why doesn't this change persist after leaving the function block?
- If this is due to some permanence of the variable A, why isn't the end result the original value of A, but the intermediate step in heapsort, which is the result of the maxheapify call?

Answer

At the start of the function, the list `A`

inside the function is the same as the list outside of the function, and any modifications made to one will be reflected in the other (it's a mutable object).

When you do an assignment to a list, you're substituting a new list object for the old list object. This breaks the connection to the outside object.

Instead of assigning a new list to `A`

, you can assign to a *slice* of `A`

and the original object will be modified in place instead.

```
A[:] = C + A[k-1:n]
```

Source (Stackoverflow)

Comments