wrkyle - 1 year ago 185

Python Question

Given some list of numbers following some arbitrary distribution, how can I define bin positions for

`matplotlib.pyplot.hist()`

Here is a MWE to display a histogram with normally distributed sample data:

`import matplotlib.pyplot as plt`

import numpy as np

x = np.random.randn(100)

plt.hist(x, bin_pos)

plt.show()

Here

`bin_pos`

Recommended for you: Get network issues from **WhatsUp Gold**. **Not end users.**

Answer Source

I found this question intriguing. The solution depends on whether you want to plot a **density function**, or a **true histogram**. The latter case turns out to be quite a bit more challenging. Here is more info on the difference between a histogram and a density function.

This will do what you want for a density function:

```
def histedges_equalN(x, nbin):
npt = len(x)
return np.interp(np.linspace(0, npt, nbin + 1),
np.arange(npt),
np.sort(x))
x = np.random.randn(1000)
n, bins, patches = plt.hist(x, histedges_equalN(x, 10), normed=True)
```

Note the use of `normed=True`

, which specifies that we're calculating and plotting a density function. In this case the areas are identically equal (you can check by looking at `n * np.diff(bins)`

). Also note that this solution involves finding bins that have the same number of points.

Here is a solution that gives approximately equal area boxes for a histogram:

```
def histedges_equalA(x, nbin):
pow = 0.5
dx = np.diff(np.sort(x))
tmp = np.cumsum(dx ** pow)
tmp = np.pad(tmp, (1, 0), 'constant')
return np.interp(np.linspace(0, tmp.max(), nbin + 1),
tmp,
np.sort(x))
n, bins, patches = plt.hist(x, histedges_equalA(x, nbin), normed=False)
```

These boxes, however, are not all equal area. The first and last, in particular, tend to be about 30% larger than the others. This is an artifact of the sparse distribution of the data at the tails of the normal distribution and I believe it will persist anytime their is a sparsely populated region in a data set.

Side note: I played with the value `pow`

a bit, and found that a value of about `0.56`

had a lower RMS error for the normal distribution. I stuck with the square-root because it performs best when the data is tightly-spaced (relative to the bin-width), and I'm pretty sure there is a theoretical basis for it that I haven't bothered to dig into (anyone?).

As far as I can tell it is not possible to obtain an exact solution to this problem. This is because it is sensitive to the discretization of the data. For example, suppose the first point in your dataset is an outlier at -13 and the next value is at -3, as depicted by the red dots in this image:

Now suppose the total "area" of your histogram is 150 and you want 10 bins. In that case the area of each histogram bar should be about 15, but you can't get there because as soon as your bar includes the second point, its area jumps from 10 to 20. That is, the data does not allow this bar to have an area between 10 and 20. One solution for this might be to adjust the lower-bound of the box to increase its area, but this starts to become arbitrary and does not work if this 'gap' is in the middle of the data set.

Recommended from our users: **Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch**. ** Free Download**