user2280041 - 1 year ago 126
C++ Question

# Pointer-to-pointer dynamic two-dimensional array

First timer on this website, so here goes..

I'm a newbie to C++ and I'm currently working through the book "Data structures using C++ 2nd ed, of D.S. Malik".

In the book Malik offers two ways of creating a dynamic two-dimensional array.
In the first method, you declare a variable to be an array of pointers, where each pointer is of type integer. ex.

int *board[4];

..and then use a for-loop to create the 'columns' while using the array of pointers as 'rows'.

The second method, you use a pointer to a pointer.

int **board;
board = new int* [10];

etc.

My question is this: which is the better method? The ** method is easier for me to visualize, but the first method can be used in much the same way. Both ways can be used to make dynamic 2-d arrays.

Edit: Wasn't clear enough with the above post. Here's some code I tried:

int row, col;

cout << "Enter row size:";
cin >> row;
cout << "\ncol:";
cin >> col;

int *p_board[row];
for (int i=0; i < row; i++)
p_board[i] = new int[col];

for (int i=0; i < row; i++)
{
for (int j=0; j < col; j++)
{
p_board[i][j] = j;
cout << p_board[i][j] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}
cout << endl << endl;

int **p_p_board;
p_p_board = new int* [row];
for (int i=0; i < row; i++)
p_p_board[i] = new int[col];

for (int i=0; i < row; i++)
{
for (int j=0; j < col; j++)
{
p_p_board[i][j] = j;
cout << p_p_board[i][j] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}

The first method cannot be used to create dynamic 2D arrays because by doing:

int *board[4];

you essentially allocated an array of 4 pointers to int on stack. Therefore, if you now populate each of these 4 pointers with a dynamic array:

for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
board[i] = new int[10];
}

what you end-up with is a 2D array with static number of rows (in this case 4) and dynamic number of columns (in this case 10). So it is not fully dynamic because when you allocate an array on stack you should specify a constant size, i.e. known at compile-time. Dynamic array is called dynamic because its size is not necessary to be known at compile-time, but can rather be determined by some variable in runtime.

Once again, when you do:

int *board[4];

or:

const int x = 4; // <--- `const` qualifier is absolutely needed in this case!
int *board[x];

you supply a constant known at compile-time (in this case 4 or x) so that compiler can now pre-allocate this memory for your array, and when your program is loaded into the memory it would already have this amount of memory for the board array, that's why it is called static, i.e. because the size is hard-coded and cannot be changed dynamically (in runtime).

On the other hand, when you do:

int **board;
board = new int*[10];

or:

int x = 10; // <--- Notice that it does not have to be `const` anymore!
int **board;
board = new int*[x];

the compiler does not know how much memory board array will require, and therefore it does not pre-allocate anything. But when you start your program, the size of array would be determined by the value of x variable (in runtime) and the corresponding space for board array would be allocated on so-called heap - the area of memory where all programs running on your computer can allocate unknown beforehand (at compile-time) amounts memory for personal usage.

As a result, to truly create dynamic 2D array you have to go with the second method:

int **board;
board = new int*[10]; // dynamic array (size 10) of pointers to int

for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
board[i] = new int[10];
// each i-th pointer is now pointing to dynamic array (size 10) of actual int values
}

We've just created an square 2D array with 10 by 10 dimensions. To traverse it and populate it with actual values, for example 1, we could use nested loops:

for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {   // for each row
for (int j = 0; j < 10; ++j) { // for each column
board[i][j] = 1;
}
}
Recommended from our users: Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch. Free Download