Saurav Sahu - 8 months ago 25

C++ Question

`std::minmax_element`

`std::min_element`

`std::max_element`

Is the overhead of processing

Answer

You do not have to worry about `std::minmax_element`

doing any sorting. It leaves the range in the exact way it was traversed. The reason it is more efficient is it can find both the max and min in a single pass where when looking for max and min separately you have to do two full traversals.

`std::minmax_element`

has the complexity of `max(floor(3/2(N−1)), 0)`

where as `std::max_element`

and `std::min_element`

each are `max(N-1,0)`

so it is about 25% less operations using `std::minmax_element`

There is also a difference where `std::minmax_element`

finds the last largest element while `std::max_element`

finds the first largest.

So if you need to find the min and max of a range then you should use `std::minmax_element`

. If you only need the min or max then you should use the specialized version.

Source (Stackoverflow)