xiii1408 xiii1408 - 1 year ago 47
R Question

Visualise distances between texts

I'm working on a research project for school. I've written some text mining software that analyzes legal texts in a collection and spits out a score that indicates how similar they are. I ran the program to compare each text with every other text, and I have data like this (although with many more points):

codeofhammurabi.txt crete.txt 0.570737
codeofhammurabi.txt iraqi.txt 1.13475
codeofhammurabi.txt magnacarta.txt 0.945746
codeofhammurabi.txt us.txt 1.25546
crete.txt iraqi.txt 0.329545
crete.txt magnacarta.txt 0.589786
crete.txt us.txt 0.491903
iraqi.txt magnacarta.txt 0.834488
iraqi.txt us.txt 1.37718
magnacarta.txt us.txt 1.09582

Now I need to plot them on a graph. I can easily invert the scores so that a small value now indicates texts that are similar and a large value indicates texts that are dissimilar: the value can be the distance between points on a graph representing the texts.

codeofhammurabi.txt crete.txt 1.75212
codeofhammurabi.txt iraqi.txt 0.8812
codeofhammurabi.txt magnacarta.txt 1.0573
codeofhammurabi.txt us.txt 0.7965
crete.txt iraqi.txt 3.0344
crete.txt magnacarta.txt 1.6955
crete.txt us.txt 2.0329
iraqi.txt magnacarta.txt 1.1983
iraqi.txt us.txt 0.7261
magnacarta.txt us.txt 0.9125

Those values directly above are distances between points on a scatter plot (1.75212 is the distance between the codeofhammurabi point and the crete point). I can imagine a big system of equations with circles representing the distances between points. What's the best way to make this graph? I have MATLAB, R, Excel, and access to pretty much any software I might need.

If you can even point me in a direction, I'll be infinitely grateful.

Answer Source

Your data are really distances (of some form) in the multivariate space spanned by the corpus of words contained in the documents. Dissimilarity data such as these are often ordinated to provide the best k-d mapping of the dissimilarities. Principal coordinates analysis and non-metric multidimensional scaling are two such methods. I would suggest you plot the results of applying one or the other of these methods to your data. I provide examples of both below.

First, load in the data you supplied (without labels at this stage)

con <- textConnection("1.75212
vec <- scan(con)

What you effectively have is the following distance matrix:

mat <- matrix(ncol = 5, nrow = 5)
mat[lower.tri(mat)] <- vec
colnames(mat) <- rownames(mat) <-

> mat
                codeofhammurabi  crete  iraqi magnacarta us
codeofhammurabi              NA     NA     NA         NA NA
crete                   1.75212     NA     NA         NA NA
iraqi                   0.88120 3.0344     NA         NA NA
magnacarta              1.05730 1.6955 1.1983         NA NA
us                      0.79650 2.0329 0.7261     0.9125 NA

R, in general, needs a dissimilarity object of class "dist". We could use as.dist(mat) now to get such an object, or we could skip creating mat and go straight to the "dist" object like this:

class(vec) <- "dist"
attr(vec, "Labels") <- c("codeofhammurabi","crete","iraqi","magnacarta","us")
attr(vec, "Size") <- 5
attr(vec, "Diag") <- FALSE
attr(vec, "Upper") <- FALSE

> vec
           codeofhammurabi   crete   iraqi magnacarta
crete              1.75212                           
iraqi              0.88120 3.03440                   
magnacarta         1.05730 1.69550 1.19830           
us                 0.79650 2.03290 0.72610    0.91250

Now we have an object of the right type we can ordinate it. R has many packages and functions for doing this (see the Multivariate or Environmetrics Task Views on CRAN), but I'll use the vegan package as I am somewhat familiar with it...


Principal coordinates

First I illustrate how to do principal coordinates analysis on your data using vegan.

pco <- capscale(vec ~ 1, add = TRUE)

> pco
Call: capscale(formula = vec ~ 1, add = TRUE)

              Inertia Rank
Total           10.42     
Unconstrained   10.42    3
Inertia is squared Unknown distance (euclidified) 

Eigenvalues for unconstrained axes:
 MDS1  MDS2  MDS3 
7.648 1.672 1.098 

Constant added to distances: 0.7667353

The first PCO axis is by far the most important at explaining the between text differences, as exhibited by the Eigenvalues. An ordination plot can now be produced by plotting the Eigenvectors of the PCO, using the plot method


which produces

enter image description here

Non-metric multidimensional scaling

A non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) does not attempt to find a low dimensional representation of the original distances in an Euclidean space. Instead it tries to find a mapping in k dimensions that best preserves the rank ordering of the distances between observations. There is no closed-form solution to this problem (unlike the PCO applied above) and an iterative algorithm is required to provide a solution. Random starts are advised to assure yourself that the algorithm hasn't converged to a sub-optimal, locally optimal solution. Vegan's metaMDS function incorporates these features and more besides. If you want plain old nMDS, then see isoMDS in package MASS.

sol <- metaMDS(vec)

> sol

metaMDS(comm = vec) 

global Multidimensional Scaling using monoMDS

Data:     vec 
Distance: user supplied 

Dimensions: 2 
Stress:     0 
Stress type 1, weak ties
No convergent solutions - best solution after 20 tries
Scaling: centring, PC rotation 
Species: scores missing

With this small data set we can essentially represent the rank ordering of the dissimilarities perfectly (hence the warning, not shown). A plot can be achieved using the plot method

plot(sol, type = "text", display = "sites")

which produces

enter image description here

In both cases the distance on the plot between samples is the best 2-d approximation of their dissimilarity. In the case of the PCO plot, it is a 2-d approximation of the real dissimilarity (3 dimensions are needed to represent all of the dissimilarities fully), whereas in the nMDS plot, the distance between samples on the plot reflects the rank dissimilarity not the actual dissimilarity between observations. But essentially distances on the plot represent the computed dissimilarities. Texts that are close together are most similar, texts located far apart on the plot are the most dissimilar to one another.