Aaron Yodaiken Aaron Yodaiken - 9 months ago 48
Ruby Question

if(!x) vs if(x==false) in ruby

I don't understand the following code:

ruby-1.9.1-p378 > puts "nil is false" unless nil
nil is false
=> nil
ruby-1.9.1-p378 > puts "nil isn't false" unless nil == false
nil isn't false
=> nil

In most languages (of a C-base, at least), if(!cond) and if(cond==false) evaluate the same. What's going on here to make that not the case?

(I'd like the details of why, I understand that that is how it is.)

Answer Source

Ruby considers that false and nil are the only two "falsy" values, while everything else is "truthy". This is by definition and can not be modified (at least in MRI). This definition is used for all builtin operators like if, unless, while, until, cond ? if_truthy : if_falsey, ||, &&, ...

Writing foo == bar will always call the == method on foo with bar as an argument. By default, nil, false, true and all other immediates like symbols, etc..., are only equal to themselves. This could be changed, though:

def nil.==(bar)
  super || bar == false
puts "nil == false" if nil == false  # => "nil == false"

In Ruby 1.9, you can also redefine the operator !, so unless foo is not necessarily the same as if !foo or the contrary of if foo:

def true.!

puts "True?"   if  true # => "True?"
puts "or not?" if !true # => "or not?"

Not that anybody would recommend doing anything like this...