Is read(2) part of the C89 specification?

I'm somewhat new to C. I am wondering, is the

read(2)

function part of the C89 specification, or just the POSIX one? I ask since I was trying to figure out the return type for

read

, and the man pages in places such as here say it's

ssize_t

. However,

ssize_t

is only required in POSIX, not regular C according to this question. This MSDN page seems to confirm my suspicions, since it says

This POSIX function is deprecated. Use the ISO C++ conformant _read instead.

I got a hold of the draft of the C89 standard, and there is no mention of read in the table of contents. There is, however, a mention of

fread

: http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c89/c89-draft.html#4.9.8.1

So then is it better to use e.g.

fread(buf, 1, sizeof(buf), stdin)

rather than

read(STDIN_FILENO, buf, sizeof(buf))

for reading from standard input?

edit: Sorry for the confusion. I did not quote MSDN to suggest that

read

was deprecated, merely to show that it is indeed a part of the POSIX standard (it mentions "POSIX function") as opposed to the C standard.

Recommended for you: Get network issues from WhatsUp Gold. Not end users.

rici

Answer Source

read() is not and never has been standard C, so if you want to write portable code which reads from files, don't use it; use fread().

On the other hand, there may be things you want to do on a Posix system which are not portable, such as use pipes and sockets. In that case, go ahead and use the Posix interfaces.

Recommended from our users: Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch. Free Download

Is read(2) part of the C89 specification?

Sign up