mgcdanny mgcdanny - 3 months ago 16
Python Question

Option to ignore extra keywords in an sqlalchemy Mapped Class constructor?

Per below, I am trying initialize a sqlalchemy Mapped Class from a python dictionary that has extra keys. Is it possible to have the Mapped Class automatically ignore the extra keys instead of throwing an error? Likewise, can the Mapped Class have default values if the keys are not present?

from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, String
class User(Base):
__tablename__ = 'users'

id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
name = Column(String)

And here is the init part:

my_example_user = {'id'=1, 'name'='john', 'extra_key'= 1234}

Which throws an invalid key error



In short, define constructor which does not pass arguments up to its superclass:

class User(Base):

    # ...

    def __init__(self, **entries):

        # NOTE: Do not call superclass
        #       (which is otherwise a default behaviour).
        #super(User, self).__init__(**entries)


I hit the same problem in transition from peewee which requires the opposite - to pass arguments to its superclass (and, therefore, constructor was already defined). So, I just tried commenting the line out and things start to work.


Also, make sure that entries do not contain (and, therefore, overwrite) any meta field in User class defined for SQLAlchemy defined, for example, those ORM relationships. It's kind of obvious (SQLAlchemy), but when mistake is made, it might not be easy to spot the problem.