kid_drew kid_drew - 4 months ago 10
Ruby Question

Ruby interface classes?

I have the following classes:

CachedObjectDbSource < CachedObjectSource
CachedObjectDalliSource < CachedObjectSource

CachedObject is a non-database object that is getting pulled from a third-party API and stored locally. CachedObject will be stored in both the database and Dalli (memcache), the real-time code will ping the Dalli source for a copy of the object, and the Dalli source will search the database source and update its cache if the object does not exist. So it's a nested call that requires each child class of CachedObjectSource to implement the same set of methods. IE, an interface.

Is there a way to write the CachedObjectSource class so that its child classes must implement the interface? Am I going about this the wrong way?


Ruby doesn't know interfaces similar to e.g. Java. Instead, Ruby programs typically use an approach called Duck Typing which basically means that you can send any message to any object which then can decide if it will respond to that, i.e. each object decides on its own which methods it has.

The closest thing you can get to an "interface" is a class (or module) that implements a method but only raises a NotImplementedError similar to this:

class CachedObjectSource
  def my_method
    raise NotImplementedError, "Implement this method in a child class"

That way, the method will be present and return a sensible error when called without being overwritten in a child class. Then, you should write some documentation making it clear what child classes have to implement to be compliant.