Vahagn Vahagn - 5 months ago 72
C++ Question

Why std::invoke is not constexpr?

Shouldn't std::invoke be

especially after constexpr lambdas in C++17?

Are there any obstacles that will prevent this?


From the proposal:

Although there is possibility to implement standard conforming invoke function template as a constexpr function, the proposed wording does not require such implementation. The main reason is to left it consistent with existing standard function objects, that could have such definition, like std::mem_fn, std::reference_wrapper and operator wrappers. Furthermore imposing such requirement will block the implementation of invoke that refers to std::mem_fn.

This proposal assumes that constexpr addition to the header would be applied consistently by a separate proposal.

Both constexpr and standard library based implementation are presented in Implementability section of the proposal.