Taymon Taymon - 5 months ago 9x
Python Question

Any reason not to use '+' to concatenate two strings?

A common antipattern in Python is to concatenate a sequence of strings using

in a loop. This is bad because the Python interpreter has to create a new string object for each iteration, and it ends up taking quadratic time. (Recent versions of CPython can apparently optimize this in some cases, but other implementations can't, so programmers are discouraged from relying on this.)
is the right way to do this.

However, I've heard it said (including here on Stack Overflow) that you should never, ever use
for string concatenation, but instead always use
or a format string. I don't understand why this is the case if you're only concatenating two strings. If my understanding is correct, it shouldn't take quadratic time, and I think
a + b
is cleaner and more readable than either
''.join((a, b))
'%s%s' % (a, b)

Is it good practice to use
to concatenate two strings? Or is there a problem I'm not aware of?


There is nothing wrong in concatenating two strings with +. Indeed it's easier to read than ''.join([a, b]).

You are right though that concatenating more than 2 strings with + is an O(n^2) operation (compared to O(n) for join) and thus becomes inefficient. However this has not to do with using a loop. Even a + b + c + ... is O(n^2), the reason being that each concatenation produces a new string.

CPython2.4 and above try to mitigate that, but it's still advisable to use join when concatenating more than 2 strings.