Leron Leron - 1 year ago 108
C# Question

How to make two SQL queries really asynchronous

My problem is based on a real project problem, but I have never used the

library or performing any serious programming involving threads so my question may be a mix of lacking knowledge about the specific library and more general misunderstanding of what asynchronous really means in terms of programming.

So my real world case is this - I need to fetch data about an user. In my current scenario it's financial data so let say I need all
, all
and all
for a certain user. In my case this means to query million of records for each property and each query is relatively slow itself, however to fetch the
is several times slower than fetching the
. So I have defined three classes for the three bank products I'm going to use and when I want to fetch the data for all the bank products of certain user I do something like this :

List<Account> accounts = GetAccountsForClient(int clientId);
List<Deposit> deposits = GetDepositsForClient(int clientId);
List<Consignation> consignations = GetConsignationsForClient(int clientId);

So the problem starts here I need to get all those three list at the same time, cause I'm going to pass them to the view where I display all users data. But as it is right now the execution is synchronous (If I'm using the term correctly here) so the total time for collecting the data for all three products is:

Total_Time = Time_To_Get_Accounts + Time_To_Get_Deposits + Time_To_Get_Consignations

This is not good because the each query is relatively slow so the total time is pretty big, but also, the
query takes much more time than the other two queries so the idea that get into my head today was - "What if I could execute this queries simultaneously". Maybe here comes my biggest misunderstanding on the topic but for me the closest to this idea is to make them asynchronous so maybe then
won't be the time of the slowest query but yet will be much faster than the sum of all three queries.

Since my code is complicated I created a simple use case which I think, reflect what I'm trying to do pretty well. I have two methods :

public static async Task<int> GetAccounts()
int total1 = 0;
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connString))
string query1 = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM [MyDb].[dbo].[Accounts]";
SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(query1, connection);
for (int i = 0; i < 19000000; i++)
string s = i.ToString();
total1 = (int) await command.ExecuteScalarAsync();
return total1;

and the second method :

public static async Task<int> GetDeposits()
int total2 = 0;
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connString))
string query2 = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM [MyDb].[dbo].[Deposits]";
SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(query2, connection);
total2 = (int) await command.ExecuteScalarAsync();
return total2;

which I call like this:

static void Main(string[] args)


As you can see I call
first and I slow the execution down on purpose so I give a chance the execution to continue to the next method. However I'm not getting any result for a certain period of time and then I get all printed on the console at the same time.

So the problem - how to make so that I don't wait for the first method to finish, in order to go to the next method. In general the code structure is not that important, what I really want to figure out is if there's any way to make both queries to execute at the same time. The sample here is the result of my research which maybe could be extended to the point where I'll get the desired result.

I'm using
just because I started with a method which was using it. In reality I'm gonna use

Answer Source

When you use the Result property on a task that hasn't completed yet the calling thread will block until the operation completes. That means in your case that the GetAccounts operation need to complete before the call to GetDeposits starts.

If you want to make sure these method are parallel (including the synchronous CPU-intensive parts) you need to offload that work to another thread. The simplest way to do so would be to use Task.Run:

static void Main(string[] args)
    var accountTask = Task.Run(async () => Console.WriteLine(await GetAccounts()));
    var depositsTask = Task.Run(async () => Console.WriteLine(await GetDeposits()));

    Task.WhenAll(accountTask, depositsTask).Wait();

Because Main can't be async and so can't use await you can simply call this method and synchronously wait for it to complete using Wait.

Recommended from our users: Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch. Free Download