hhh hhh - 20 days ago 7
R Question

A^k for matrix multiplication in R?

Suppose A is some square matrix. How can I easily exponentiate this matrix in R?

I tried two ways already: Trial 1 with a for-loop hack and Trial 2 a bit more elegantly but it is still a far cry from Ak simplicity.

Trial 1

set.seed(10)
t(matrix(rnorm(16),ncol=4,nrow=4)) -> a
for(i in 1:2){a <- a %*% a}


Trial 2

a <- t(matrix(c(0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0),nrow=4))
i <- diag(4)
(function(n) {if (n<=1) a else (i+a) %*% Recall(n-1)})(10)

42- 42-
Answer

Although Reduce is more elegant, a for-loop solution is faster and seems to be as fast as expm::%^%

m1 <- matrix(1:9, 3)
m2 <- matrix(1:9, 3)
m3 <- matrix(1:9, 3)
system.time(replicate(1000, Reduce("%*%" , list(m1,m1,m1) ) ) )
#   user  system elapsed 
#  0.026   0.000   0.037 
mlist <- list(m1,m2,m3)
m0 <- diag(1, nrow=3,ncol=3)
system.time(replicate(1000, for (i in 1:3 ) {m0 <- m0 %*% m1 } ) )
#   user  system elapsed 
#  0.013   0.000   0.014 

library(expm)  # and I think this may be imported with pkg:Matrix
system.time(replicate(1000, m0%^%3))
# user  system elapsed 
#0.011   0.000   0.017 

On the other hand the matrix.power solution is much, much slower:

system.time(replicate(1000, matrix.power(m1, 4)) )
   user  system elapsed 
  0.677   0.013   1.037 

@BenBolker is correct (yet again). The for-loop appears linear in time as the exponent rises whereas the expm::%^% function appears to be even better than log(exponent).

> m0 <- diag(1, nrow=3,ncol=3)
> system.time(replicate(1000, for (i in 1:400 ) {m0 <- m0 %*% m1 } ) )
   user  system elapsed 
  0.678   0.037   0.708 
> system.time(replicate(1000, m0%^%400))
   user  system elapsed 
  0.006   0.000   0.006 
Comments