herman herman - 3 months ago 26
Javascript Question

Partial state changes for Vaadin's AbstractJavascriptComponent

I'm implementing a JavaScript-based Vaadin component that will need to show and update a relatively large data set. I'm doing this by extending


I'm trying to keep the JS side as "dumb" as possible, delegating user interactions to the server using RPC, and which updates the shared state. Then the JS connector wrapper's
function is called with the new state, which causes the DOM to be updated accordingly.

I have 2 problems:

  1. I don't want to transfer the whole data set each time a small part gets updated.

  2. I don't want to entirely rebuild the UI each time either.

I can solve the second problem by keeping the previous state and comparing parts of it to find out what changed and only make the necessary DOM changes.
But that still leaves the first problem.

Do I have to stop using Vaadin's shared state mechanism and instead only use RPC for communicating the changes to the state?

I've been doing some testing, and it certainly appears that Vaadin's shared state mechanism is horrible in terms of efficiency:

Whenever the component calls
in order to update some property in the state object (or even without updating anything), the whole state object is transferred. The only way to avoid this, as far as I can see, is to not use the shared state mechanism and instead use RPC calls to communicate specific state changes to client.

There are some issues with the RPC approach that will need to be resolved, for example: if you change a value multiple times within a single request/response cycle, you don't want to make the RPC call multiple times. Instead, you want only the last value to be sent just like the shared state mechanism only sends the final state in the response. You can keep dirty flags for each part of the state that you want to send separately (or just keep a copy of the previous state and compare), but then you need to somehow trigger the RPC call at the end of the request handling. How can this be done?

Any ideas on this are welcome!

Update 2:

Vaadin 8 fixes the root issue: it sends only the changed state properties. Also, it doesn't call
on the JS connector anymore when only doing an RPC call (and not changing any state).


OP is correct in stating that shared state synchronisation is inefficient for AbstractJavaScriptComponent-based components. The entire state object is serialised and made available to the Javascript connector's onStateChange method whenever the connector is marked as dirty. Other non-javascript components handle state updates more intelligently by only sending changes. The exact place in the code where this happens is line 97 in com.vaadin.server.LegacyCommunicationManager.java

boolean supportsDiffState = !JavaScriptConnectorState.class

I'm not sure why state update is handled differently for AbstractJavaScriptComponent-based components. Maybe it's to simplify the javascript connector and remove the need to assemble a complete state object from deltas. It would be great if this could be addressed in a future version.

As you suggest, you could dispense with JavaScriptComponentState completely and rely on server->client RPC for updates. Keep dirty flags in you server-side component or compare old state and new state by any mechanism you want.

To coalesce the changes and send only one RPC call for each change, you could override beforeClientResponse(boolean initial) in your server-side component. This is called just before sending a response to the client and is your chance to add a set of RPC calls to update the client-side component.

Alternatively, you could override encodeState where you have free-reign to send exactly whatever JSON you like to the client. You could choose to add a list of changes to the base JSON object returned by super.encodeSate. Your javascript connector could interpret as appropriate in its onStateChange method.

Edited to add: calling getState() in your server-side component will mark the connector as dirty. If you want to get state without marking it as dirty then use getState(false) instead.