Johnas - 1 year ago 59

C++ Question

A line is defined by two end points P1[x1, y1], P2[x2, y2]. Let Q [xq, yq] be a tested point. Both coordinates are double.

Differencies:

`dx1 = x2 - x1`

dy1 = y2 - y1

dx2 = xq - x1

dy2 = yq - y1

Norms

`double n1_sq = sqrt(dx1 * dx1 + dy1 * dy1);`

double n2_sq = sqrt(dx2 * dx2 + dy2 * dy2);

My assumption: test with normalized vectors is less sensitive to rounding errors

`double test = (dx1 / n1_sq ) * (dy2 / n2_sq) - ( dx2 / n2_sq ) * ( dy1 / n1_sq );`

than

`double test = dx1 * dy2 - dx2 * dy1;`

The problem arises in the following cases:

A) A tested point is Q is on the line

`Q = [0.5(x1 + x2), 0.5(y1 + y2)]`

In many cases, the result is not zero, but

`test >> 0`

B) Inappropriate configuration of the line/ tested point

Let us move the tested point to the start point, dist (Q, |p1, p2|) = 7e-4

`P1 = [0, 0]`

P2 = [1000000000.00001, 1000000000.00001]

Q = [0.0,0.001]

Normalized test: 0.7

Unnormalized test: 1.0e+6

Let us move the tested point to the end point dist (Q, |p1, p2|) = 7e-4

`P1 = [0, 0]`

P2 = [1000000000.00001, 1000000000.00001]

Q = [1000000000.0, 1000000000.001]

Normalized test: 5.0e-13

Unnormalized testt: 1.1 e+6

Let us move the tested point to the start point, dist (Q, |p1, p2|) = 7e-4

`P1 = [0, 0]`

P2 = [0.00001, 0.00001]

Q = [0.0,0.001]

Normalized test: 0.7

Unnormalized test: 1.0e-8

A) The normalized test for long segments is less reliable. The Case 2 could be considered as machinery zero with the following decision: Q is on |p1, p2|...

B) For short segments, the situation is reversed, an unnormalized test gives a machinery zero.

But result of both tests are not constant and the resulted value does not bring any information about real distance of the point Q from the line |p1, p2|. Using a threshold in both tests does not bring a correct result... And the value of the threshold can not be determined before..

What should I do?

My solution is to replace both test with the new test: test the distance of point Q and line P1, p2 and using some threshold eps. Point Q with

`dist (Q,|P1,P2|) < eps, (for example 1e-10)`

will be placed on the line P1, P2... The result of the test does not depend on configuration of points (ie if we move the test point Q along the segment P1, P2)

Is anyone using a better test or have a different solution of this problem?

Recommended for you: Get network issues from **WhatsUp Gold**. **Not end users.**

Answer Source

I don't understand your test. It doesn't seem to involve the coordinates of Q at all. Also, for two values `u`

and `v`

, the norm is computed with minimum rounding as `M * sqrt(1 + m / M)`

, where `M = max(|u|, |v|)`

and `m = min(|u|, |v|)`

. As for a `dist`

function, that is the best approach, although you might want to make the threshold a function of the line segment length. It really depends on your application.

Recommended from our users: **Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch**. ** Free Download**