titus.andronicus titus.andronicus - 1 year ago 155
C Question

Lint Warning: #647: Suspicious truncation

I have read the related questions to this Lint warning about the suspicious truncation, but here it is a purely C case.

The following line is where the

Warning #647
pops up:

pCont->sig -= (signed int64_t)((sub2 << 8)/pCont->freq + 1);

is also 64 bit signed (type
signed int64_t
), and both
are 32 bit unsigned. All this is compiled with armcc.

Already tried, without success, to cast the
to unsigned 32 bit, but the problem persists.

Any idea on what I might try, or what is going wrong here?

Answer Source

From this reference about the warning

For example:

(long) (n << 8)

might elicit this message if n is unsigned int, whereas

(long) n << 8

would not. In the first case, the shift is done at int precision and the high order 8 bits are lost even though there is a subsequent conversion to a type that might hold all the bits. In the second case, the shifted bits are retained.

This seems to fit your case exactly and also show you how to fix it.

Recommended from our users: Dynamic Network Monitoring from WhatsUp Gold from IPSwitch. Free Download